Members
Register Forgot Password?

5.0L Ford Mustang 5.0L discussion area for heads, rebuilding, tuning, idle issues and all other modifications and performance parts.


Welcome to Canadian Mustang Owners Club


Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-25-2009, 08:38 AM   #1
Horsepower  
CMOC Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
iTrader: (0)
Location: Ontario
My Ride: 1990 5.0
Posts: 9
Credits: 4,582
Total Props: 0
Good morning,
Any ideas on the possible HP of an 89 5.0 with: GT40 heads, B Cam, Long Tube Headers, High Flow Cats, Gear Drive Timing.
Portstangly is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
+ 0 -
Old 11-25-2009, 01:07 PM   #2
CMOC Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
iTrader: (0)
Location: Woodbridge, Ontario
My Ride: Mustang
Posts: 56
Credits: 3,101
Total Props: 0
My guess is about 250 to the wheels???
Graffs is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
+ 0 -
Old 11-25-2009, 06:49 PM   #3
Moderator
 
Apocalypse Pony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
iTrader: (0)
Location: Cardboard Box, but one of the really nice ones
My Ride: '69 Wife
Posts: 2,797
Credits: 43,567
Total Props: 20
I'm guessing 265.

Do we get a CTC Gift Card if we guess right??
Apocalypse Pony is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
+ 0 -
Old 11-26-2009, 11:02 AM   #4
CMOC Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
iTrader: (0)
Location: Woodbridge, Ontario
My Ride: Mustang
Posts: 56
Credits: 3,101
Total Props: 0
Want a CT gift card? See me thread about the GE Nighthawk ads! lol
Graffs is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
+ 0 -
Old 11-27-2009, 01:33 PM   #5
CMOC Addict
 
zeb951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
iTrader: (0)
Location: Calgary
My Ride: 1983 Crimson Cat
Posts: 518
Credits: 8,841
Total Props: 0
Should be 225 stock to wheels on an 89 5.0, shouldn't it? My guess? 260-270, probably closer to the 260. Just a guess though.
zeb951 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
+ 0 -
Old 12-22-2009, 04:09 PM   #6
CMOC Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
iTrader: (0)
Location: Earth
My Ride: 1979 hatch
Posts: 184
Credits: 1,923
Total Props: 2
stock is 225 at the CRANK. Your set up should net somewhere in the 250-275 WHEEL HP.
1979svo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
+ 0 -
Old 12-22-2009, 10:02 PM   #7
CMOC Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
iTrader: (0)
Location: Winnipeg
My Ride: 2004 Coupe
Posts: 291
Credits: 6,417
Total Props: 0
Well,

Seeing as you were 225 at the crank stock..and I assume you also have a cold air kit of some sort I would guess around 250 HP at the rear wheels and about 305 at the crank..maybe a bit more but as we don't know if you did a complete exhaust, whether there is an under drive pulley kit installed..that sort of thing...hard to say for sure..best bet get a dyno tune and then you'll know.
Blackheart4355 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
+ 0 -
Old 12-22-2009, 10:41 PM   #8
I am the post KING
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
iTrader: (0)
Location: Calgary
My Ride: 2012 Black500 -399hp
Posts: 15,318
Credits: 208,655
Total Props: 16
Me thinks they over rated the 87-93 5.0. I thought my 90gt had 225hp but they rerated the 5.0 to 205 which sucks but. I guess 255hp
SNAKEBITE is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
+ 0 -
Old 01-02-2010, 11:20 AM   #9
CMOC Addict
 
Stang Seller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
iTrader: (0)
Location: Montreal
My Ride: Mustangs
Posts: 500
Credits: 8,898
Total Props: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNAKEBITE View Post
Me thinks they over rated the 87-93 5.0. I thought my 90gt had 225hp but they rerated the 5.0 to 205 which sucks but. I guess 255hp
That was just a change due to a different method of dyno testing the engines.

The '93 Cobra was rated at 255hp at the crank with a weak cam and 1.7 rockers, and Cobra intake. The gear drive doesn't add power, but can change the powercurve if you've got the cam degreed differently. The B cam is junk, and peak numbers don't tell the whole story. Peak numbers, if I had to guess (not knowing any other parameters of the engine), I would estimate this engine to make about 230-240hp at the wheels, which is about 270-280 at the crank. Low RPM torque suffers with the B cam, and by this I mean that with another cam (ie Stock 5.0 HO cam) it may not make more peak HP and torque but would most definitely be a faster car.
SS
Stang Seller is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
+ 0 -
Old 01-02-2010, 11:20 AM
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


 
Latest Threads
- by Toxix
- by gtwin
- by 2tone
- by Fixer
- by SVT
- by xGHOSTx




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.
Canadian Mustang Owners Club