Mustang Power Adders Mustang Superchargers, Nitrous, Turbo and other power adding performance tips and tricks. Covering NOS, Paxton, Vortech, Kennebell, Roush and more. Earn points for raffles to win prizes!

5.0....what next?

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 2, 2010 | 09:37 PM
  #11  
VAEM's Avatar
Retired Admin
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,821
From: Barrie, Ontario
^^^ ok. You've given advise to go with welded sub frame connectors in the past. And you've voiced your concerns about bolt on sub frame connectors too. And your a pretty smart guy so I'm gonna listen to you (I temporarily cancelled my order for BBK bolt on sub frame connectors). But, why are the welded ones better?
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 04:14 PM
  #12  
1low03gt's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 17,778
From: Ontario
The weld in ones give better support,the bolt ons allow flex through the bolt locations.They are not bad,but if your gonna spend the money,might aswell spend the extra on the weld ons.They act more part of the chassis with almost zero flex compared to the bolt ons.
Sorry to to have made you change your mind VAEM....without trying LOL,but i swear its for the better LOL!
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 06:27 PM
  #13  
rampant racing's Avatar
CMOC Veteran
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 338
From: sarnia,ont.
you can get the bolt on ones and have a few welds added in critical areas to strengthen it even more and prevent the bolt holes from elongating from flex. and i know the op doesn't want a supercharger but i have to say a vortech is pretty easy to install and work great.i got one and i love it. get the v3 and you don't even have to run oil lines as they are selfcontained/ lubricated.couple that with a little more cam and better valve springs and hang on.
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 01:05 PM
  #14  
mach1steve's Avatar
CMOC Rookie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 176
From: Burlington, Ontario
Hypertuspastic

Yes.... Hypertuspastic pistons.
Unlike the earlier years 5.0L engines, the 94 & 95 model years changed from Forged Pistons to Hyperuetectic pistons. These are obviously not as strong as the earlier years pistons.... so watch what you do so that you don't exceed the limitations of these pistons.

Thus, if you're going boost (ie Turbo or Supercharging) keep it a reasonable tune and 8-9 psi. My 94GT had BBk shorty headers, MSD Ign, 3.73 gears, Vortech blower at 9 psi, cold air kit, and an Anderson Methylhydrate chemical intercooler (a what you say ?). It dyno'd at DaSilva at 316 rwhp and 345 ft/lbs of torque. Doesn't sound like much, but it was not an aggresive tune as it was tuned for longevity and reliability.... don't get me wrong, when the blower comes on you know it ! It's all about torque.

The Anderson unit basically sprays Windsheild washer (50% methylhydrate/50% water) into the incoming charge of the blower, when under boost. What this does is cools the charge (as a standard Intercooler does not fit a 94-95 mustang) and adds octane in the form of the Methylhydrate to prevent undu knocking. Without this or soemthing like this, any kind of sustained boost (like drag racing or road track racing) will take out a piston and **POOF**... no more engine. The Anderson Kit is about $200.

The same thing can be said for adding aftermarket performance aluminum heads and cams and intakes.... etc etc. You can reach a point with that kind of power & stress where the pistons will fail.

With $6000 as a budget, I would rebuild the engine with forged pistons, H beam rods, steel crank and alum heads, cams etc and then just don't worry about it ! For that matter you might squeeze in a stroker kit and make it a 347... now you've got some torque !

And don't be hypnotized like most guys, by the almighty horsepower numbers.... it's torque that spins your tires and presses you into the seat when you accelerate... not horsepower ! And a stroker engine is a great way to get torque... or a blower.

my 2 cents... and I've only been doing this for for 34 yrs since I was 18

Mach1steve
Old Mar 27, 2012 | 09:15 AM
  #15  
foxstang's Avatar
CMOC Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 10
From: Quebec
gt-40 upper/lower intake with 24lbs injectors, e-303 cam and aftermarket head mention before in the discuss will match pretty well your current setup. Good luck.
Old Mar 27, 2012 | 11:07 AM
  #16  
SNAKEBITE's Avatar
I am the post KING
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,244
From: Calgary
Of coarse what FastEd says no doubt
Old Mar 27, 2012 | 07:44 PM
  #17  
Fernstang's Avatar
CMOC Rookie
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 40
From: Toronto ON
Originally Posted by mach1steve
Yes.... Hypertuspastic pistons.
Unlike the earlier years 5.0L engines, the 94 & 95 model years changed from Forged Pistons to Hyperuetectic pistons. These are obviously not as strong as the earlier years pistons.... so watch what you do so that you don't exceed the limitations of these pistons.

Thus, if you're going boost (ie Turbo or Supercharging) keep it a reasonable tune and 8-9 psi. My 94GT had BBk shorty headers, MSD Ign, 3.73 gears, Vortech blower at 9 psi, cold air kit, and an Anderson Methylhydrate chemical intercooler (a what you say ?). It dyno'd at DaSilva at 316 rwhp and 345 ft/lbs of torque. Doesn't sound like much, but it was not an aggresive tune as it was tuned for longevity and reliability.... don't get me wrong, when the blower comes on you know it ! It's all about torque.

The Anderson unit basically sprays Windsheild washer (50% methylhydrate/50% water) into the incoming charge of the blower, when under boost. What this does is cools the charge (as a standard Intercooler does not fit a 94-95 mustang) and adds octane in the form of the Methylhydrate to prevent undu knocking. Without this or soemthing like this, any kind of sustained boost (like drag racing or road track racing) will take out a piston and **POOF**... no more engine. The Anderson Kit is about $200.

The same thing can be said for adding aftermarket performance aluminum heads and cams and intakes.... etc etc. You can reach a point with that kind of power & stress where the pistons will fail.

With $6000 as a budget, I would rebuild the engine with forged pistons, H beam rods, steel crank and alum heads, cams etc and then just don't worry about it ! For that matter you might squeeze in a stroker kit and make it a 347... now you've got some torque !

And don't be hypnotized like most guys, by the almighty horsepower numbers.... it's torque that spins your tires and presses you into the seat when you accelerate... not horsepower ! And a stroker engine is a great way to get torque... or a blower.

my 2 cents... and I've only been doing this for for 34 yrs since I was 18

Mach1steve
so, true
Old Mar 28, 2012 | 09:43 AM
  #18  
Ray Spencer's Avatar
CMOC Supreme poster
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,437
From: Sherwood Park, Alberta
Sounds like you have enough power already.
Old Mar 28, 2012 | 12:28 PM
  #19  
SNAKEBITE's Avatar
I am the post KING
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,244
From: Calgary
in today's world who has enough power tehehehe
Old Mar 28, 2012 | 05:29 PM
  #20  
MustangGTJim's Avatar
CMOC Rookie
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 35
From: Ottawa
Here are a few ideas for ya. This is what my 94GT has.
Attached Thumbnails 5.0....what next?-1994mustang1_0002.jpg  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 AM.