Gear swap in the future?
CMOC Rookie
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 126
From: Sarnia, Ontario
If you're trying to say that the numbers I was provided with are wrong, than give me the numbers you have instead of being so vague. If you read that thread I linked above, the very first guy who responded has the EXACT SAME tranny (auto) and said he was at 2800 RPM at 75 MPH, with wheels/tires that were stock height. Do you disagree for some reason?
Thread Starter
CMOC Postaholic
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,163
From: Blackfalds AB
If you're trying to say that the numbers I was provided with are wrong, than give me the numbers you have instead of being so vague. If you read that thread I linked above, the very first guy who responded has the EXACT SAME tranny (auto) and said he was at 2800 RPM at 75 MPH, with wheels/tires that were stock height. Do you disagree for some reason?
OH i almost forgot i use this calculator for a basic estamate its not designed for a mustang but if you know your trasmission and final drive ratio's it doesnt matter
http://www.geocities.com/z_design_studio/
Last edited by Terminal Velocity; Mar 3, 2007 at 08:44 PM.
CMOC Rookie
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 126
From: Sarnia, Ontario
Logic wins again? There's nothing to win here. Dude, I don't know what you're trying to prove and/or why you're trying to make this into a pissing match, but just don't bother. I'm not saying you're wrong, what I'm saying is that you haven't given anything but vague comments that leave me still up in the air. If you, for example, knew what the actual numbers should be from using that calculator, than why not just come out and say that right off the bat? Yanno? I personally don't know our final drive numbers, nor do I know the rest of the gear ratios, so that calculator doesn't help me right now. I'll search the ratios and final drives though, then plug 'em in and see what I get. I figured that seeing what people's tach's vs speedos were (with the same tranny/vehicle) would be just as useful.
Thanks for your help and sorry for the confusion, I guess.
Thanks for your help and sorry for the confusion, I guess.
CMOC Rookie
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 126
From: Sarnia, Ontario
That Wikipedia site's pretty good, wow. I googled "4R70W" and got a wiki link (HERE) that was pretty informative. They've done their research. I didn't expect it.
Terminal - I used the ratios I found on the Wiki link and punched 'em in on that link you provided. Pretty cool stuff. Says 2,630 RPM at 70 MPH. Makes sense to me. Thanks for the linky.
Terminal - I used the ratios I found on the Wiki link and punched 'em in on that link you provided. Pretty cool stuff. Says 2,630 RPM at 70 MPH. Makes sense to me. Thanks for the linky.
Thread Starter
CMOC Postaholic
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,163
From: Blackfalds AB
That Wikipedia site's pretty good, wow. I googled "4R70W" and got a wiki link (HERE) that was pretty informative. They've done their research. I didn't expect it.
Terminal - I used the ratios I found on the Wiki link and punched 'em in on that link you provided. Pretty cool stuff. Says 2,630 RPM at 70 MPH. Makes sense to me. Thanks for the linky.
Terminal - I used the ratios I found on the Wiki link and punched 'em in on that link you provided. Pretty cool stuff. Says 2,630 RPM at 70 MPH. Makes sense to me. Thanks for the linky.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
White97
Mustang Related Want To Buy
1
Mar 16, 2005 04:17 PM
