5.0L Ford Mustang 5.0L discussion area for heads, rebuilding, tuning, idle issues and all other modifications and performance parts.

annoying problem..

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-11-2005, 07:27 AM
  #11  
CMOC Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
Scones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Windsor, Ontario
Posts: 1,775
stock h-pipe and no muffs....that's my solution for the best bang for your buck exhaust
Scones is offline  
Old 02-11-2005, 01:09 PM
  #12  
CMOC Rookie
Thread Starter
 
Kevin 88GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Delta, BC
Posts: 41
i wonder if i got a new catback setup.. hmmmmmmmmmm. it just sounds SO beater when it happens, i have to figure this out.
Kevin 88GT is offline  
Old 02-11-2005, 06:16 PM
  #13  
CMOC Rookie
 
red82gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kelowna, B.C.
Posts: 35
That would probably work, the shape of the flowmasters lends well to raw fuel sitting in puddles in them.
You've checked your timing first though? How many miles on your car? Worn timing chain can cause it to backfire as well but by the time there is enough slack to make it backfire, the car will usually feel really lazy.
I'm also a fan of the speed density system, I wouldn't swap it out unless you are going to do a cam. Even then, I'd consider having a chip burned on a chassis dyno to make it idle properly rather than go to mass air. The Mass air system is good for adaptation, but the speed density cars run harder.
red82gt is offline  
Old 02-13-2005, 04:01 PM
  #14  
CMOC Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
Scones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Windsor, Ontario
Posts: 1,775
red82 is exactly right, and IMO Mass Air cars aren't really that more adaptable than Speed Density, if you change injectors you have to have the MAF calibrated for it
Scones is offline  
Old 02-13-2005, 05:37 PM
  #15  
CMOC Addict
 
89LXBlack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Scarborough
Posts: 838
Originally Posted by Kevin 88GT
i wonder if i got a new catback setup.. hmmmmmmmmmm. it just sounds SO beater when it happens, i have to figure this out.
There are some great sounding and performing cat-backs around.
89LXBlack is offline  
Old 02-22-2005, 08:56 AM
  #16  
CMOC Addict
 
Stang Seller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 500
I dont think your problem stems from running Flowmasters, thats the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard (no offense). I've had Flowmasters on many of my cars and I've only had the backfiring issue on my best friends '95 when we switched to an off road h pipe and only on a hard downshift. That was fixed when I installed a pair of new 02 Sensors. I've even had a speed density vert that ran great with a K+N, B-cam, shorty headers, off road H pipe and Flowmasters and the car never backfired.
By backfire are you talking about a loud POP or a series of pop-pop-pop sounds?
SS
Stang Seller is offline  
Old 02-22-2005, 03:47 PM
  #17  
CMOC Rookie
Thread Starter
 
Kevin 88GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Delta, BC
Posts: 41
it seems that after i put a new spout connector on, it corrected the issue. or it hasn't happened in a long time since then, and its just a fluke. you ran a cam on a SD car and didnt reprogram the computer?? most people make out the SD cars to be so finnicky if you don't convert, but since talking on here it seems you can do almost anything without mass air.
Kevin 88GT is offline  
Old 02-22-2005, 04:01 PM
  #18  
CMOC Addict
 
Stang Seller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 500
Originally Posted by Kevin 88GT
it seems that after i put a new spout connector on, it corrected the issue. or it hasn't happened in a long time since then, and its just a fluke. you ran a cam on a SD car and didnt reprogram the computer?? most people make out the SD cars to be so finnicky if you don't convert, but since talking on here it seems you can do almost anything without mass air.
Well, to be totally honest with you its hit and miss sometimes. I've run several cams in SD cars without any problems, and a few others wouldnt even idle. The B cam seems to work well with SD because it has 114* of lobe separation. Not my fav cam, as I hate all letter cams but it works. Crower makes some fantastic cams, I believe one is a 51110 or something with about .480" lift, 220* duration and 114 LS. Works without flycutting the pistons (87-95) and performs great even with stock heads, obviously works great with some more work and usually you can get away with keeping the stock SD comp. You can do alot to your car without having to switch to MAF or even getting a chip burnt.
SS
Stang Seller is offline  
Old 02-22-2005, 04:28 PM
  #19  
CMOC Rookie
Thread Starter
 
Kevin 88GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Delta, BC
Posts: 41
thats good to know, because wasting money on mass air when i don't have to, sounds like a crappy idea. for that money i can throw in some 410's. it would be awesome if someone had some sort of database on what components work well with SD cars and which don't . I'm sure many people (like you) have that knowledge in their head, but it would be great to have a list, maybe I'll look around the net.
Kevin 88GT is offline  
Old 02-23-2005, 12:30 AM
  #20  
CMOC Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
Scones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Windsor, Ontario
Posts: 1,775
i've never come across anything like that, it just takes some experience....knowing what others have done, what's worked and what hasn't. you've also gotta be a little picky about what advice you do take and what you don't. personally i'd rather assume something will work if someone says "yeah, i did it on mine....here it is", that the advice of someone who says "oh yeah, you just can't do that to them"....seems obvious when i put it like that lol
Scones is offline  


Quick Reply: annoying problem..



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:27 AM.