5.0L Ford Mustang 5.0L discussion area for heads, rebuilding, tuning, idle issues and all other modifications and performance parts.

Cold air

Old Aug 16, 2006 | 07:55 AM
  #1  
eyeless's Avatar
Thread Starter
CMOC Rookie
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 25
From: Edmonton, Alberta
Cold air

I was just wondering if there are any major differences between a a fenderwell cold air intake and an engine compartment cold air intake; aside from the obvious. Any pro's/con's of each would be greaty appreciated...can't seem to find a whole lot on the comparison.

PS-this would be for a 1987 5.0L GT
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 11:17 AM
  #2  
OVERKILL's Avatar
CMOC Postaholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,456
From: Ontario
Fender-well gets true cold air (like the factory airbox does) wheras the engine-bay one gets hot engine air, so its not a true CAI.
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 11:19 AM
  #3  
eyeless's Avatar
Thread Starter
CMOC Rookie
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 25
From: Edmonton, Alberta
I kind of figured that the fender well intake would be the better way to go for cold air for that reason: engine bays are hot.
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 07:43 PM
  #4  
Ponyryd's Avatar
CMOC Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,531
From: Windsor
Depends what you've got, my Cobra had a K&N engine bay CAI, it had a sheild around the filter. On my '93 I've just got a cone filter for which I had a piece of stainless made up to enclose it in the engine compartment to keep it cold. The fenderwell style can sometimes cause problems with the MAF, but on an '87 unless you've converted it to mass-air, you've really got nothing to worry about. I personally don't like the chrome piping up to the intake-it seems to really retain a lot of heat.
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 08:12 PM
  #5  
White_Snake's Avatar
CMOC Newbie
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 103
From: Trenton, Ontario
one diff between the fenderwell one and just the filter would be teh bend comming from out of the fender.
the other would be a "straight shot" type...+les turbulance..
right?
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 08:21 PM
  #6  
Ponyryd's Avatar
CMOC Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,531
From: Windsor
^Yeah that's why they don't always work well on mass-air cars, the meter works better with a straight shot of air, the bend isn't too beneficial to airflow either, they look cool though, nice and chrome!
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 09:48 PM
  #7  
OVERKILL's Avatar
CMOC Postaholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,456
From: Ontario
Neither is the stock "curogated" upper tube............no better than the big bend in the fenderwell stuff.

Jay Allen recommends the AFM Powerpipe.

His advice is good enough for me.
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 11:39 PM
  #8  
eyeless's Avatar
Thread Starter
CMOC Rookie
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 25
From: Edmonton, Alberta
Thanks a lot for the help guys. I'm definately going to go with the AFM CAI
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 08:36 PM
  #9  
Ponyryd's Avatar
CMOC Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,531
From: Windsor
Originally Posted by OVERKILL
Neither is the stock "curogated" upper tube............no better than the big bend in the fenderwell stuff.

Jay Allen recommends the AFM Powerpipe.

His advice is good enough for me.
True but the less bends the better, why have an extra 1 or 2 bends when you don't have to? I've heard nothing bad about the AFM, but I would just run an open element with a heat shield.
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 09:25 PM
  #10  
OVERKILL's Avatar
CMOC Postaholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,456
From: Ontario
I would think that the air coming from inside the fender would still be cooler than the air that the element gets, even with the heat shield.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42 AM.