JPC Supercharged 2011 Mustang Makes 800 RWHP

Old Nov 17, 2010 | 06:56 PM
  #1  
VAEM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Retired Admin
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,821
From: Barrie, Ontario
JPC Supercharged 2011 Mustang Makes 800 RWHP

Lately, a lot of talk in the automotive world has surrounded turbochargers. From aftermarket manufacturers to Ford itself, the turbocharger talk has raised a lot of eyebrows about the future of the Mustang. The latest question came from pictures of a Mustang mule that appeared to have been supercharged. We forget just how potent superchargers though, here is a video to remind us.

JPC Racing has teamed up with DiabloSport to build a Mustang 5.0 drag car. Many of the 5.0 Mustang drag cars we’ve seen so far have been of the supercharged variety, but certainly not all of them. JPC went with a Paxton, NOVI-series supercharger on the 5.0 liter V8 engine. As we already know, these engines are very susceptible to boost. JPC cranked the boost up to 12 psi and for good measure added a nitrous oxide system. The result was 802 horsepower, on an otherwise completely stock engine…though the sound of the engine at idle may suggest it does have aftermarket cams.

[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXuCBFVF2XY&feature=player_embedded[/YOUTUBE]
Old Nov 17, 2010 | 07:21 PM
  #2  
SNAKEBITE's Avatar
I am the post KING
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,244
From: Calgary
Holy hp Batman. I wonder what the tq number was.
Old Nov 17, 2010 | 09:02 PM
  #3  
1low03gt's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 17,778
From: Ontario
I was wondering the same thing.It would have to be up there no doubt!!!Great hp numbers!!!
Another thing i am wondering about aswell,is there aftermarket cams out there yet for the latest 5.0L!!??
Old Nov 17, 2010 | 11:30 PM
  #4  
herbz's Avatar
CMOC Postaholic
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,310
From: Cochrane, Alberta
My guess is around 700ft/lds for rwtrq if the horsepower is around 800. Sick car
Old Nov 18, 2010 | 04:52 PM
  #5  
SNAKEBITE's Avatar
I am the post KING
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,244
From: Calgary
^^^you don't think it may be closer to the hp number?
Old Nov 18, 2010 | 08:57 PM
  #6  
1low03gt's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 17,778
From: Ontario
I was thinking close to the hp numbers too,but it is a 4V,their torque numbers are slightly lower compared to the hp numbers when making bigger hp.
Old Nov 18, 2010 | 10:13 PM
  #7  
herbz's Avatar
CMOC Postaholic
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,310
From: Cochrane, Alberta
Originally Posted by 1LOW03GT
I was thinking close to the hp numbers too,but it is a 4V,their torque numbers are slightly lower compared to the hp numbers when making bigger hp.
My reasoning exactly. I think the torque would be at least 700 but not equal to the hp thats for sure.
Old Nov 19, 2010 | 04:19 PM
  #8  
SNAKEBITE's Avatar
I am the post KING
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,244
From: Calgary
Am I wrong with this assumption-turbos make more tq than s/c's do.
Old Nov 19, 2010 | 05:57 PM
  #9  
herbz's Avatar
CMOC Postaholic
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,310
From: Cochrane, Alberta
Originally Posted by SNAKEBITE
Am I wrong with this assumption-turbos make more tq than s/c's do.
I think I've heard something like that before. You hardly ever see cars anymore (like Mustangs) with more torque than hp. I've seen the odd 03/04 Cobra with more torque than hp but I think its rare.
Old Nov 20, 2010 | 03:57 PM
  #10  
SNAKEBITE's Avatar
I am the post KING
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,244
From: Calgary
That is what I thought as well
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
VAEM
Ford Mustang Pictures and Videos
5
Dec 7, 2010 09:58 PM
hotford
4.6L 4v
9
Jun 15, 2005 11:30 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 AM.