View Poll Results: Which motor mounts?
Energy Suspension



3
100.00%
Prothane



0
0%
Voters: 3. You may not vote on this poll
Prothane vs. Energy Suspension
Prothane vs. Energy Suspension
I'm looking to get motor mounts for my 3.8L Supercharged Supercoupe engine (in a 94 Mustang). I have a choice between Prothane and Energy Suspension for the mounts. Anyone have any opinions on either of these? Engine stock has 315 ft lbs torque to the crank, mine will be modded with a 10% pulley, raised SC top (better flow) and a Coy Miller Stage 1 cam, so the torque will be somewhere between 315 and 350 I'd say.
HAHAHAAHH, that is NUTS!
Anyways, I have Energy Suspension ones on mine, I really like them, they are definitely noticeably stiffer than stock (READ: you can feel them in the car) but its not irritating and I'm sure it allows more power to be transferred to the ground, as opposed to being lost through the twist of the engine on the mounts. They are of very high quality and I've been quite impressed with them.
Anyways, I have Energy Suspension ones on mine, I really like them, they are definitely noticeably stiffer than stock (READ: you can feel them in the car) but its not irritating and I'm sure it allows more power to be transferred to the ground, as opposed to being lost through the twist of the engine on the mounts. They are of very high quality and I've been quite impressed with them.

