Greetings from Ottawa
Adminut
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,722
From: Maple Tree, Branch #2 above the rope swing
If I can do it, anyone can do it, I'm not the most tech savvy either, but you're welcome, no problem.
I went into your album, got the pic in fulll size, and then right clicked. A menu box popped up and I selected "Copy Image Address".
Then I went into the "Quick Reply" box, selected "Image" , then pasted the image address.....voila'. Upsized pic.
If i hadn't done it, someone else would have, we've got a pretty good bunch here, not like the usual internet keyboard cowboys.
I went into your album, got the pic in fulll size, and then right clicked. A menu box popped up and I selected "Copy Image Address".
Then I went into the "Quick Reply" box, selected "Image" , then pasted the image address.....voila'. Upsized pic.
If i hadn't done it, someone else would have, we've got a pretty good bunch here, not like the usual internet keyboard cowboys.
CMOC Veteran
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 289
From: Barrie
Thanks for the welcomes and congratulations. I'm not considering a supercharger for the GT; even naturally aspirated, it feels peppier than the R/T (even though the R/T had a 70 h.p. and 100 ft-lb torque advantage with the supercharger). And I'm not sure I'd know what to do with the extra horsepower; 435 seems to be more than enough for getting into mischief! Just think - it's got ten more horsepower than the original modern iteration of the Challenger, the 2008 SRT .
I was thinking of upping the decibels a bit with either a Borla Touring or Magnaflow Street cat-back, but when I hear the sound comparisons on Youtube I shake my head and think. "Dang, those factory pipes sound pretty alpha-male." If I do swap cat-backs, it will likely be for the improved performance (less weight, more flow) as much as for the sound.
I have a pic of the GT on my Facebook page; I'll try to import it here, but I'm not very tech savvy.
Love those Brembos.
I was thinking of upping the decibels a bit with either a Borla Touring or Magnaflow Street cat-back, but when I hear the sound comparisons on Youtube I shake my head and think. "Dang, those factory pipes sound pretty alpha-male." If I do swap cat-backs, it will likely be for the improved performance (less weight, more flow) as much as for the sound.
I have a pic of the GT on my Facebook page; I'll try to import it here, but I'm not very tech savvy.
Love those Brembos.
I have Roush on my Boss and really like them, but they can be loud in the upper RPMs. Don’t forget MBRP, a great CANADIAN company in Huntsville, ON. My friend has them on his 2016 PP and they are great sounding. Can’t remember which ones thou.
Moderator
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,871
From: Slave Lake, AB
ChadStang: I agree, the Roush axle-back sounds great, and if I go with that instead of a cat-back, Roush will be my choice. I'm thinking cat-back because you lose about 30 lbs. weight and get better flow. On the other hand, the axle-back is easier on the wallet. Something to ponder over these dreary winter months.
Apocalypse Pony: Thanks for "upsizing" my GT's picture. How did you do that? Did you use a magic wand? (Like I said, I'm not tech savvy; in fact, I bought a computer and got on the Internet only a couple of months ago - no, really.)
Apocalypse Pony: Thanks for "upsizing" my GT's picture. How did you do that? Did you use a magic wand? (Like I said, I'm not tech savvy; in fact, I bought a computer and got on the Internet only a couple of months ago - no, really.)
You can always add one of these with any axle back of your choice
https://www.cjponyparts.com/resonato...-2018/p/RDXP1/
Most of the weight savings you will see with a cat back is from the resonator being removed
https://www.cjponyparts.com/resonato...-2018/p/RDXP1/
Most of the weight savings you will see with a cat back is from the resonator being removed
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
