2008 trash talk
#22
no im talking about my v6. its only a 7.5 in it, so im pretty sure if i had slicks and a good track with lotsa track bite, i would break something. but spinning at 65km/h with a under powered v6 with a 18 year old m90 and an auto is pretty impressive IMO. but i know the 1995 gt is good for some pounding, and oh im gonna drive the guts out of it for sure, and i get to work on my shifting lol
#23
Exactly. That little six of his actually works pretty damn good and on a tire, probably was capable of high 13's. It did make damn good numbers on Joe's dyno.
And Nate, you got it all wrong mate, the Capri has an engine, AND a transmission! THey are both in it! It just lacks ANY sort of rear suspension right now, and has no wheels, LOL! It's also only partially wired and needs the fuel lines affixed to the body and hooked up.
I have been collecting parts, rather than installing parts, hehehhe
And Nate, you got it all wrong mate, the Capri has an engine, AND a transmission! THey are both in it! It just lacks ANY sort of rear suspension right now, and has no wheels, LOL! It's also only partially wired and needs the fuel lines affixed to the body and hooked up.
I have been collecting parts, rather than installing parts, hehehhe
#26
well its not gonna be the capri because it has no engine lol. and my car is sold on thursday and wait till yas see my new baby. 1995 gt 100xxxkm stored everywinter and its a stick. and id never know how good my car was because it needs slick and not a 7.5 rear end lol. but the new car is just gorgeous and overkill came with me to look at it and he gave me the AOK. also my car with a v6, auto could spin the tires at 60-65km/h on dry roads with posi, and thats pretty impressive with an auto v6, overkill got the impression that it could be a 13 second car so there!!! but with super nate power it would run 7s LOL
#29