5.0L Ford Mustang 5.0L discussion area for heads, rebuilding, tuning, idle issues and all other modifications and performance parts.

Horsepower

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 08:38 AM
  #1  
Portstangly's Avatar
Thread Starter
CMOC Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 9
From: Ontario
Horsepower

Good morning,
Any ideas on the possible HP of an 89 5.0 with: GT40 heads, B Cam, Long Tube Headers, High Flow Cats, Gear Drive Timing.
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 01:07 PM
  #2  
Graffs's Avatar
CMOC Rookie
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 56
From: Woodbridge, Ontario
My guess is about 250 to the wheels???
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 06:49 PM
  #3  
Apocalypse Pony's Avatar
Adminut
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,722
From: Maple Tree, Branch #2 above the rope swing
I'm guessing 265.

Do we get a CTC Gift Card if we guess right??
Old Nov 26, 2009 | 11:02 AM
  #4  
Graffs's Avatar
CMOC Rookie
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 56
From: Woodbridge, Ontario
Want a CT gift card? See me thread about the GE Nighthawk ads! lol
Old Nov 27, 2009 | 01:33 PM
  #5  
zeb951's Avatar
CMOC Addict
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 518
From: Calgary
Should be 225 stock to wheels on an 89 5.0, shouldn't it? My guess? 260-270, probably closer to the 260. Just a guess though.
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 04:09 PM
  #6  
1979svo's Avatar
CMOC Rookie
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 184
From: Earth
stock is 225 at the CRANK. Your set up should net somewhere in the 250-275 WHEEL HP.
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 10:02 PM
  #7  
Blackheart4355's Avatar
CMOC Veteran
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 286
From: Winnipeg
Well,

Seeing as you were 225 at the crank stock..and I assume you also have a cold air kit of some sort I would guess around 250 HP at the rear wheels and about 305 at the crank..maybe a bit more but as we don't know if you did a complete exhaust, whether there is an under drive pulley kit installed..that sort of thing...hard to say for sure..best bet get a dyno tune and then you'll know.
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 10:41 PM
  #8  
SNAKEBITE's Avatar
I am the post KING
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,244
From: Calgary
Me thinks they over rated the 87-93 5.0. I thought my 90gt had 225hp but they rerated the 5.0 to 205 which sucks but. I guess 255hp
Old Jan 2, 2010 | 11:20 AM
  #9  
Stang Seller's Avatar
CMOC Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 500
From: Montreal
Originally Posted by SNAKEBITE
Me thinks they over rated the 87-93 5.0. I thought my 90gt had 225hp but they rerated the 5.0 to 205 which sucks but. I guess 255hp
That was just a change due to a different method of dyno testing the engines.

The '93 Cobra was rated at 255hp at the crank with a weak cam and 1.7 rockers, and Cobra intake. The gear drive doesn't add power, but can change the powercurve if you've got the cam degreed differently. The B cam is junk, and peak numbers don't tell the whole story. Peak numbers, if I had to guess (not knowing any other parameters of the engine), I would estimate this engine to make about 230-240hp at the wheels, which is about 270-280 at the crank. Low RPM torque suffers with the B cam, and by this I mean that with another cam (ie Stock 5.0 HO cam) it may not make more peak HP and torque but would most definitely be a faster car.
SS




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 AM.