VT Stage 2 Cams & Emissions
03-24-2006, 07:21 PM
#31
CMOC Addict
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 536
Originally Posted by ZR 5.0
Congrats on getting it through..................I'd love to see how much the numbers might change with either a 195 or perhaps a 205 stat instead of the 180. The low temp stat combined with colder temps / fast cool down are likely contributing to the problem.
Your thoughts Paul?
Your thoughts Paul?
03-25-2006, 01:03 AM
#32
CMOC Supreme poster
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ajax, Ontario
Posts: 2,668
Originally Posted by meister@steeda.ca
I do not really see this helping reduce the HC's....if we had easier access to the car I could have tried to fix the issue
06-29-2006, 08:15 AM
#37
CMOC Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1
Originally Posted by BlueGT
Hydrocarbons.....150 limit. 1050 reading 
That was the idle test. It passes barely on the driving test.
No guarantees the tune will change anything according to Steeda.ca and VT
That was the idle test. It passes barely on the driving test.No guarantees the tune will change anything according to Steeda.ca and VT
10-05-2006, 10:38 PM
#39
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ontario
Posts: 17,778
Originally Posted by WOT MODS
I'll have to look it up again but I was quoted as a "Gross Polluter" @ idle in particular with a reading of 2000 or something - Comp 278s - This is prior to a complete tune - haven't had it tested lately...
: :toilet: .
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
P.Meister
4.6L 4v
32
05-24-2005 09:02 PM
