Tweecers
02-15-2007, 07:36 PM
#11
CMOC Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Halifax,NS
Posts: 56
I'd much rather pay someone to tune my car and enjoy driving it then spend night after night fooling around with this setting and that setting, trying to get it right, plus the fact that you'll know your car is safe everytime you step you it. But listen man your money is your money do what you please. It is obvious from your first post on this thread you dont have a clue about a tweecer and how it works, if thats the route you want to go I'd go with a Anderson Ford Motorsports PMS far superior to the tweecer and much easier to use, the tweecer was used in the late 90's old school stuff. i would also like to learn how to do build superchargers but i decided it would be much cheaper to give the guys at paxton a call seeing there take all of the guess work out of it. And yes i am joking about building a supercharger. But like i said if thats the route you wanna go it's your pocket book brudder. Just don't nasty at people that give you honest advice, despite what people think all shops aren't out to rape you.
Have fun with the Tweecer.
Have fun with the Tweecer.
02-15-2007, 07:50 PM
#12
HELP SUPPORT CMOC. DONATE!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Trenton
Posts: 4,271
I'd much rather pay someone to tune my car and enjoy driving it then spend night after night fooling around with this setting and that setting, trying to get it right, plus the fact that you'll know your car is safe everytime you step you it. But listen man your money is your money do what you please. It is obvious from your first post on this thread you dont have a clue about a tweecer and how it works, if thats the route you want to go I'd go with a Anderson Ford Motorsports PMS far superior to the tweecer and much easier to use, the tweecer was used in the late 90's old school stuff. i would also like to learn how to do build superchargers but i decided it would be much cheaper to give the guys at paxton a call seeing there take all of the guess work out of it. And yes i am joking about building a supercharger. But like i said if thats the route you wanna go it's your pocket book brudder. Just don't nasty at people that give you honest advice, despite what people think all shops aren't out to rape you.
Have fun with the Tweecer.
Have fun with the Tweecer.
No, I don't own TwEECer, but I will..........all shops are not out to rape you LOL. Either way, I know someone that will help me out with the TwEECer. Old school? hahaha I wonder were you heard that before......is this why 80% of the people still use the TwEECer?
And yes it my money, and ill do what want. Every 2nd sentance you see this "Steep learning curve" so yes I am prepared of what im about to tackle!
Besides this thread is already getting old I have read alot since then 01-10-2007 07:01 PM
02-27-2007, 09:58 PM
#16
CMOC Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lidsville, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 407
I just bought a TwEECer RT for my SVO. It all depends on what you want, and are willing to put up with... or.. learn. Getting a tune and being done with it is by far the easiest way, but I am going to be constantly making small changes and don't want to have to run to or rely on someone when those times arrise, not to mention not many people out there do the 2.3Ts so finding someone......
From what I have seen so far it's actually a bit simpler with the PE and LA EECs vs alot of the other ones.
I have alot to learn but that never killed anyone, already have the wideband and plan to buy a cheap datalogger to work in conjunction with the RTs so I can wire in a blow through MAF, and log it compared to VAM voltage in the RT to help with the maf conversion.
I absolutely can't stand having to rely on people for something, so to me even if there is a steep learning curve in the end it's worth it to me.
From what I have seen so far it's actually a bit simpler with the PE and LA EECs vs alot of the other ones.
I have alot to learn but that never killed anyone, already have the wideband and plan to buy a cheap datalogger to work in conjunction with the RTs so I can wire in a blow through MAF, and log it compared to VAM voltage in the RT to help with the maf conversion.
I absolutely can't stand having to rely on people for something, so to me even if there is a steep learning curve in the end it's worth it to me.
02-28-2007, 01:06 AM
#17
HELP SUPPORT CMOC. DONATE!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Trenton
Posts: 4,271
I agree, Im looking forward to buying one and being able to tune it a little here, and a little there. I also love the fact of the switch for different tunes, I have something upo my sleave for a 4 tunes........
How much did you pay for your RT? I am looking right now for one.
How much did you pay for your RT? I am looking right now for one.
02-28-2007, 11:13 AM
#18
CMOC Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lidsville, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 407
I got mine on Ebay, from Bryant Motorpsorts. Got the base model at first and was going to just buy separate datalogging, but realized I wanted the RT for real time troublshooting. IE: coolant temp sensor goes bad, or something ign related PIP flakes and makes timing erratic or whatever I "think" I should be able to see all that on a datalog. I can see what's going on with the RT model.
04-12-2007, 06:40 PM
#19
CMOC Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lidsville, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 407
Illusions.. so did you buy a Tweecer?
I got mine up and running on the Cougar to play around, I have to be honest it's a bit annoying to learn, and you need to have someone who has a 5.0L setup willing to kinda learn you along, I am lucky and have a buddy from FL helping me out on the 2.3T end.
So far... getting the datalogging to work properly has been the most frustratiing part. I have a grip on adjusting the timing maps, and changing injector size, and I moved the rev limit down to 4000 rpm for fun and sat in the driveway boucing the car off the 4000 rpm limit and it acted like a 2 step and made 13 psi boost!! LOL.
I had the way the fueling is worked out explained to me and it makes sense now, but like I say, I paid for the datalogging and kindof wish I wouldnt have, if you get a Tweecer RT though, I have a feeling it will work better for the A9_ series computers the 5.0Ls use. The 2.3s I have heard were hit or miss.
There are certain steps you have to follow and if you don't you can make it go haywire, if you bought one and are using it post up what you think so far. From what I see it will be a neat tuning tool, but it's only as good as it's user
which isn't saying much right now. 
I got mine up and running on the Cougar to play around, I have to be honest it's a bit annoying to learn, and you need to have someone who has a 5.0L setup willing to kinda learn you along, I am lucky and have a buddy from FL helping me out on the 2.3T end.
So far... getting the datalogging to work properly has been the most frustratiing part. I have a grip on adjusting the timing maps, and changing injector size, and I moved the rev limit down to 4000 rpm for fun and sat in the driveway boucing the car off the 4000 rpm limit and it acted like a 2 step and made 13 psi boost!! LOL.
I had the way the fueling is worked out explained to me and it makes sense now, but like I say, I paid for the datalogging and kindof wish I wouldnt have, if you get a Tweecer RT though, I have a feeling it will work better for the A9_ series computers the 5.0Ls use. The 2.3s I have heard were hit or miss.
There are certain steps you have to follow and if you don't you can make it go haywire, if you bought one and are using it post up what you think so far. From what I see it will be a neat tuning tool, but it's only as good as it's user
which isn't saying much right now.
04-12-2007, 10:29 PM
#20
I am also looking for a system for my 2.3 turbo. I have decided to go with the Megasquirt system and I talk to joel at WPracing and he is going to set it up. I'd like to see how your system works out for ya. Keep us updated
