stock 2 stock 4.6L Vs 5.0??
#22
It will depend on the driver forsure.Both are awesome,no disagreeing there,the 5.0L is cheaper to mod,and the 4.6 isn't .But i know with the right driver,99+ 4.6 2V without a doubt.'96 to '98 4.6 2V horsepower equals .
#28
So, I went through some back issues of Motor Trend and Car and Driver I had and found that they both tested 1992 Mustang LXs, one was a stick shift coupe for sure, tested by MT ran 14.8 the other was tested by Car and Driver (not sure of body/trans), it also ran 14.8, so basically I'm saying a PI 4.6 would beat a 5.0 stock for stock.
And, my dick is bigger than all yours!!
And, my dick is bigger than all yours!!
#29
Originally Posted by diggyd
Not counting the 32V'er the 5.0 is a way better looking motor.
Anyway a stock 5.0 Notch will beat a stock 4.6 anyday.
Anyway a stock 5.0 Notch will beat a stock 4.6 anyday.
Originally Posted by AeR0
i think a 5.0L coupe could smoke a 4.6 simply b/c they are lighter.
Mitch Richardson ran his '03 GT 2V to a 13.9 i believe with a set of welded in flowmaster mufflers which give you little to no hp,and the rest of the stang is BONE STOCK .
Originally Posted by White_Snake
my dick is bigger than yours!
same ...they all kick ***!
same ...they all kick ***!
#30
Originally Posted by diggyd
Not counting the 32V'er the 5.0 is a way better looking motor.
Anyway a stock 5.0 Notch will beat a stock 4.6 anyday.
Anyway a stock 5.0 Notch will beat a stock 4.6 anyday.
most stock 5.0's were lucky to run a high 14
I have seen many stock (99+) 4.6's in the mid to low 14's...