Mustang Power Adders Mustang Superchargers, Nitrous, Turbo and other power adding performance tips and tricks. Covering NOS, Paxton, Vortech, Kennebell, Roush and more. Earn points for raffles to win prizes!
View Poll Results: Dry or Wet?
Dry
33.33%
Wet
66.67%
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll

DRY VS WET Kits

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-13-2006, 05:06 AM
  #1  
CMOC Elite
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Scones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Windsor, Ontario
Posts: 1,775
DRY VS WET Kits

I'm talking simple kits here, the dry ones vs the wet ones (where fuel flows through the intake with the nitrous). Which do you prefer and why?

I don't want any mention of kits like the NOSSle(sp?) system.

Let the debate begin.
Scones is offline  
Old 01-13-2006, 08:17 AM
  #2  
CMOC Supreme poster
iTrader: (4)
 
BlueGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ajax, Ontario
Posts: 2,668
I personally like dry kits as they tend to be cheaper and easier to install. They're not suited for every application, however.
BlueGT is offline  
Old 01-13-2006, 08:20 AM
  #3  
CMOC Addict
 
89LXBlack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Scarborough
Posts: 838
I've been made aware of the dangers of running a wet kit. Some intakes don't flow very well allowing the fuel/nitrous/air mixture to "pool" in the intake with the potential for some major damage.

Doesn't sound too safe to me.
89LXBlack is offline  
Old 01-13-2006, 09:44 AM
  #4  
CMOC Elite
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Scones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Windsor, Ontario
Posts: 1,775
Originally Posted by CMOC Admin
I personally like dry kits as they tend to be cheaper and easier to install. They're not suited for every application, however.
Could you be more specific please? Personally I would never use a wet kit in any application.
Scones is offline  
Old 01-13-2006, 10:38 AM
  #5  
CMOC Addict
 
03WhiteGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 683
Dry kits are so much easier to install. I'd go dry if I was going to spray. Easier to tune as well
03WhiteGT is offline  
Old 01-13-2006, 01:24 PM
  #6  
BIZ
CMOC Supreme poster
iTrader: (4)
 
BIZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: L-Town
Posts: 2,426
From what I have seen at the track, most of the serious guys I run with are using a wet kit, now I dont know much about Nitrous but a friend of mine ran a wet kit for years and it worked great and gave amazing results on the dyno for a 2000gt, close to 400 TQ. Although I have read several applications where plastic intakes dont seem to like it to well.

O and I voted wet just because it didnt have any votes :biggrin:

continue the debate please...I would love to learn this stuff.
BIZ is offline  
Old 01-13-2006, 04:41 PM
  #7  
CMOC Rookie
iTrader: (2)
 
BIG NICK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: canada?
Posts: 106
I would use a dry on a boosted application because of the intercooling effect and there is less of a chance of a nos backfire since there would be no wet fuel in the intake tract.On a n/a I would run a wet to add the correct amount of fuel for the h/p your making on the juice.
BIG NICK is offline  
Old 01-13-2006, 07:50 PM
  #8  
CMOC Addict
 
NXGHOST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 636
Wet kits should only be run with RPM window Switches. This eliminates the possibility of a backfire. Dry kits have problems to. Tuning a sytem which spikes Fuel pressure is a biatch. I prefer wet, weasily tunable and a much more consistent result. Just run the window switch.
NXGHOST is offline  
Old 01-13-2006, 08:24 PM
  #9  
CMOC Addict
 
P.Meister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 536
If you have a returnless fuel car, DO NOT run a wet kit. You will suck the rails dry and have a huge lean spike. The Ford EEC's are powerful enough to add in fuel using a tune as long as you have the proper injectors/pump.

Spraying in front of the mass air meter is the PROPER way to run nitrous and the easiest (but only good for up to a 75 shot). The EEC will see the nitrous as added air, and compensate for fuel and spark (not spark on pre 94 computers)

On a dry kit, have the proper injectors, and pump and compensate via the computer with a chip.

Last edited by P.Meister; 01-13-2006 at 08:27 PM.
P.Meister is offline  
Old 01-17-2006, 03:07 PM
  #10  
CMOC Veteran
 
89LXStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: St.Thomas
Posts: 376
Originally Posted by meister@steeda.ca
If you have a returnless fuel car, DO NOT run a wet kit. You will suck the rails dry and have a huge lean spike. The Ford EEC's are powerful enough to add in fuel using a tune as long as you have the proper injectors/pump.

Spraying in front of the mass air meter is the PROPER way to run nitrous and the easiest (but only good for up to a 75 shot). The EEC will see the nitrous as added air, and compensate for fuel and spark (not spark on pre 94 computers)

On a dry kit, have the proper injectors, and pump and compensate via the computer with a chip.

What about Zex kits with there little brain box setup??
89LXStang is offline  


Quick Reply: DRY VS WET Kits



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 PM.