5.0L Ford Mustang 5.0L discussion area for heads, rebuilding, tuning, idle issues and all other modifications and performance parts.

Cam lift

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-05-2006, 09:52 PM
  #11  
CMOC Rookie
Thread Starter
 
fabs_4000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Whitecourt
Posts: 34
Originally Posted by 82306
If my cam is 268 @50 will you guarantee it will work with .512 lift?

On the other hand I will bet you I can get a 220 lobe @50 with just over .600" lift to work. It wouldn't be with the stock installed height nor the stock valve spring but realistically if you care about your engine you wouldn't be re-using the stock springs with any cam swap - hell I don't keep them when using the stock cam!

Duration is the more important factor when dealing with piston to valve clearance.
Well if you look at the motorsport cams they are generally .512 or less except for the x and z but the durations are more than your 268, and the motorsport ones aren't the real "wild" ones either..... or am I mistaken?
fabs_4000 is offline  
Old 08-05-2006, 10:13 PM
  #12  
CMOC Rookie
iTrader: (3)
 
82306's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 186
I am talking about duration @50. Advertised duration for a typical lobe like that would be 319 to 325 degrees (Hyd. Roller).
82306 is offline  
Old 08-05-2006, 10:40 PM
  #13  
CMOC Rookie
Thread Starter
 
fabs_4000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Whitecourt
Posts: 34
Originally Posted by 82306
I am talking about duration @50. Advertised duration for a typical lobe like that would be 319 to 325 degrees (Hyd. Roller).
ok I see what you are saying
fabs_4000 is offline  
Old 08-09-2006, 09:14 PM
  #14  
CMOC Postaholic
iTrader: (3)
 
OVERKILL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,456
Originally Posted by 82306
If my cam is 268 @50 will you guarantee it will work with .512 lift?

On the other hand I will bet you I can get a 220 lobe @50 with just over .600" lift to work. It wouldn't be with the stock installed height nor the stock valve spring but realistically if you care about your engine you wouldn't be re-using the stock springs with any cam swap - hell I don't keep them when using the stock cam!

Duration is the more important factor when dealing with piston to valve clearance. Flycutting the stock pistons isn't just for clearing a bigger cam it is also to add radial clearance for the larger valves that come standard on most aftermarket heads these days.

Couldn't have said it better myself, thank you very much!!!!

Example.

My custom cam, on my GT40's is .552/.544 lift with 1.7 ratio peds. It would have been ~.600 but I didn't want to convert to stud-mount, and .550 is about the safe limit for ped's. Duration is ~222/230 and it should clear.

My current cam (that is coming out) is a TFS #1 also being run with 1.7's, its .530/.544 221/225 (if my memory isn't too foggy) and clears no problem, and the GT40's have larger than stock valves obviously.

Duration has far more to do with P2VC than lift does, as peak lift doesn't occur until the piston is well down the bore. Its the valve events when the valve is chasing the piston, piston chasing the valve that cause issue. Radial clearance is another, often overlooked issue as well, and is a very common one with large-valve heads.
OVERKILL is offline  
Old 08-09-2006, 09:20 PM
  #15  
CMOC Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
Ponyryd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Windsor
Posts: 1,531
Originally Posted by 82306
If my cam is 268 @50 will you guarantee it will work with .512 lift?

On the other hand I will bet you I can get a 220 lobe @50 with just over .600" lift to work. It wouldn't be with the stock installed height nor the stock valve spring but realistically if you care about your engine you wouldn't be re-using the stock springs with any cam swap - hell I don't keep them when using the stock cam!

Duration is the more important factor when dealing with piston to valve clearance. Flycutting the stock pistons isn't just for clearing a bigger cam it is also to add radial clearance for the larger valves that come standard on most aftermarket heads these days.
^I'm pretty sure the thread starter asked how much lift the stock heads can handle, I don't remember a question of how much lift or duration a stock short-block can handle or whether to replace valvesprings, so knowing they can handle at least .512, that was my post, I wasn't saying I could guarantee anything-but thanks for the lesson. :teeth:

Last edited by Ponyryd; 08-09-2006 at 09:25 PM.
Ponyryd is offline  
Old 08-09-2006, 11:51 PM
  #16  
CMOC Rookie
iTrader: (3)
 
82306's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 186
Stock long block can handle .512" lift, more if you have the pistons fly-cut to accept more lift
Your words verbatim. You are correct he did ask what lift the stock heads could handle but you answered with the above. I did not try to threaten your tech guru status but I was simply correcting something that was wrong - no harm intended.
82306 is offline  
Old 08-10-2006, 12:08 AM
  #17  
CMOC Rookie
iTrader: (3)
 
82306's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 186
On that note do you know if he's had any worked done to his heads in the past? For example lets say a new set of springs were installed and someone never set/checked the proper installed height.

What happens if his springs go into coil bind at .500 lift now? Maybe the heads were milled .040”… or there has been 10 valve jobs done to them unbeknownst to the current owner? Bottom line is there are no guarantees and you must check your stuff and not hold a few tips from an internet forum as gospel.

Radial clearance is another, often overlooked issue as well, and is a very common one with large-valve heads.
Good point here. If you use the clay method always check for radial clearance. You must cover the entire relief and not just merely fill it full of clay. Too many times I have heard of individuals checking the p to v only for depth, finding it's within spec and all therefore should be well….

Once the engine is run a valve gets tweaked and the builder cannot figure out how this could have possibly happened with all the ‘clearance’ they initially though was there. I guess it’s a good thing witness marks usually confirm where they forgot to check.

Last edited by 82306; 08-10-2006 at 12:14 AM.
82306 is offline  
Old 08-10-2006, 06:29 AM
  #18  
CMOC Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
Ponyryd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Windsor
Posts: 1,531
I am not afraid of my tech guru status being threatened, yes, I said that a stock long block can handle .512" lift because I know it can, fabs was not asking about duration and did not give cam specs, he merely asked what stock heads can handle...which I answered-adding that a stock long block could handle it, if anyone else was interested.
Originally Posted by fabs_4000
Hey there, does anyone know how much lift the stock heads can handle? :2:
Now, I could stay here and give out scenerios of what happens if this..what happens if that, but it has nothing to do with the question being asked, question has been answered, I'll move on. I will add that it sounds like you know what you're talking about, but it seems to be over and above said question.
Ponyryd is offline  
Old 08-10-2006, 10:08 AM
  #19  
CMOC Veteran
 
james93stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: lasalle,ontario
Posts: 419
On my 88 GT i was running a E-303 cam with 1.7 roller rockers, was told it was equal to 529 lift and it ran fine :thumb1:
james93stang is offline  
Old 08-10-2006, 10:48 AM
  #20  
CMOC Rookie
iTrader: (3)
 
82306's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 186
I wasn’t trying to roast you, as I am sure your help is much appreciated on this forum. I took a somewhat vague answer and tried to paint a clearer picture. Also I was stressing the importance of checking your parts vs. relying on general internet insight to avoid it.

I said that a stock long block can handle .512" lift because I know it can
For sure? And you’re going to guarantee this? Ever heard of an 1986 H.O… Maybe with your engine, but what exactly does he have here? Again you never know and can’t be sure until it is verified. Lets say his heads have been milled to china by a previous owner and the I.H is wrong, when he fires up his engine with a new cam and it hits, whose fixing it?

Now, I could stay here and give out scenerios of what happens if this..what happens if that, but it has nothing to do with the question being asked, question has been answered, I'll move on.
You HAVE to give out scenarios because that’s the reality of life. I see 50+ engines a season and let me tell you wouldn’t believe what’s actually out there. Especially when it comes to valvetrain. Truth is you never actually asked him any more details before ‘confirming’ what will work. SPEEDTOSPARE answered it dead nuts on and went on to even ask about his combination. See below

keep it under .500 lift with a 1.6 rocker and you should be safe. Keep in mind theres no guarantee that they duration is going to be too big. Puddy the heads just to be safe - SPEEDTOSPARE
Stock heads can handle more lift if set up correctly. The question is how much do you need and have they been properly ported to utilize it. If the head is unported or the port job is terrible then it won’t matter much anyways.

I will add that it sounds like you know what you're talking about, but it seems to be over and above said question.
Too much information is better then not enough. Hell even G.I Joe knew knowing was half the battle!

Last edited by 82306; 08-10-2006 at 10:52 AM.
82306 is offline  


Quick Reply: Cam lift



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:08 PM.